4.8 Article

Near-Infrared Triggered Upconversion Polymeric Nanoparticles Based on Aggregation-Induced Emission and Mitochondria Targeting for Photodynamic Cancer Therapy

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 9, 期 32, 页码 26731-26739

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b07768

关键词

aggregation-induced emission; upconversion nanoparticles; photodynamic therapy; cancer cells; mitochondria

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21504064, 21674080]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin [16JCQNJC02800]
  3. Research Funds for Tianjin Educational Committee [20140501]
  4. 131 talents program of Tianjin
  5. leading talents of Tianjin Educational Committee
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JCKY-QKJC05]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an auspicious strategy for cancer therapy by yielding reactive oxygen species (ROS) under light irradiation. Here, we have developed nearinfrared (NIR) triggered polymer encapsulated upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) based on aggregation-induced emission (ALE) characteristics and mitochondria target ability for PDT. The coated AIE polymer as a photosensitizer can be photoactivated by the up-converted energy of UCNPs upon 980 nm laser irradiation, which could generate ROS efficiently in mitochondria and induce cell apoptosis. Moreover, a sheddable poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) layer was easily conjugated at the surface of NPs. The pH-responsive PEG layer shields the surface positive charges and shows stronger protein-resistance ability. In the acidic tumor environment, PEGylated NPs lose the PEG layer and show the mitochondria-targeting ability by responding to tumor acidity. A cytotoxicity study indicated that these NPs have good biocompatibility in the dark but exert severe cytotoxicity to cancer cells, with only 10% cell viability, upon being irradiated with an NIR laser. The AIE nanoparticles are a good candidate for effective mitochondria targeting photosensitizer for PDT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据