4.7 Article

Influence of structural and operating factors on performance degradation of the diesel particulate filter based on composite regeneration

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 121, 期 -, 页码 838-852

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.04.155

关键词

Diesel particulate filter; Composite regeneration; Performance degradation; Influence factor; Fuzzy grey relational analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51676066, 51276056, 91541121]
  2. Hunan Provincial Department of Education in China [16C1432]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to effectively investigate the effects of various factors on the DPF's performance deterioration, and obtain the primary influence factor, an efficient evaluation method is proposed in this work. Firstly, the maximum wall temperature and the pressure drop are taken as the evaluation indexes of DPF's performance deterioration (thermal aging and filter clogging) respectively, and the orthogonal experimental design is used for obtaining the simulation conditions of test cases. Then, the impacts of four structural factors (wall thickness, mean pore size, porosity and channel width) and five operating factors (exhaust flow rate, exhaust oxygen concentration, microwave power, catalytic additive mass concentration and deposited ash mass) on DPF's performance deterioration are evaluated by fuzzy membership grades and Euclidean grey relational grades, respectively. Finally, fuzzy grey relational analysis is employed to make a comprehensive evaluation. The results show that the wall thickness and the channel width have the most noticeable effect on filter clogging and thermal aging among all structural factors, respectively. Moreover, the deposited ash mass and the microwave power are the most important operating factors for filter clogging and thermal aging, respectively. This work offers us great reference value for optimizing DPF performances and improving its degradation resistance. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据