4.8 Article

Frequency-division multiplexer and demultiplexer for terahertz wireless links

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-00877-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. US National Science Foundation
  2. US Army Research Office
  3. W.M. Keck Foundation
  4. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-13-INFR-0011-01]
  5. TERALINKS [ANR-16-CHR2-000601]
  6. Lille University
  7. IEMN institute (RF/MEMS Characterization Center)
  8. IRCICA institute [USR CNRS 3380]
  9. CNRS
  10. French RENA-TECH network
  11. French Programmes d'investissement d'avenir Equipex [FLUX 0017]
  12. ExCELSiOR project
  13. Nord-Pas de Calais Regional council
  14. FEDER through the CPER Photonics for Society
  15. IEMN institute (Nanofab)
  16. IEMN institute (Telecom platform)
  17. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys
  18. Directorate For Engineering [1505536] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of components for terahertz wireless communications networks has become an active and growing research field. However, in most cases these components have been studied using a continuous or broadband-pulsed terahertz source, not using a modulated data stream. This limitation may mask important aspects of the performance of the device in a realistic system configuration. We report the characterization of one such device, a frequency multiplexer, using modulated data at rates up to 10 gigabits per second. We also demonstrate simultaneous error-free transmission of two signals at different carrier frequencies, with an aggregate data rate of 50 gigabits per second. We observe that the far-field spatial variation of the bit error rate is different from that of the emitted power, due to a small nonuniformity in the angular detection sensitivity. This is likely to be a common feature of any terahertz communication system in which signals propagate as diffracting beams not omnidirectional broadcasts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据