4.5 Article

In Silico Design of DNP Polarizing Agents: Can Current Dinitroxides Be Improved?

期刊

CHEMPHYSCHEM
卷 18, 期 16, 页码 2279-2287

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201700299

关键词

dinitroxides; dynamic nuclear polarization; MAS-DNP; simulations; solid-state NMR

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences
  2. National Science Foundation Engineering Research Center program [EEC-0813570]
  3. Spedding Fellowship - Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program at the Ames Laboratory
  4. DOE by Iowa State University [DE-AC02-07CH11358]
  5. NSERC (Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada)
  6. Government of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Numerical calculations of enhancement factors offered by dynamic nuclear polarization in solids under magic angle spinning (DNP-MAS) were performed to determine the optimal EPR parameters for a dinitroxide polarizing agent. We found that the DNP performance of a biradical is more tolerant to the relative orientation of the two nitroxide moieties than previously thought. Generally, any condition in which the g(yy) tensor components of both radicals are perpendicular to one another is expected to have near-optimal DNP performance. Our results highlight the important role of the exchange coupling, which can lessen the sensitivity of DNP performance to the inter-radical distance, but also lead to lower enhancements when the number of atoms in the linker becomes less than three. Lastly, the calculations showed that the electron T-1e value should be near 500 mu s to yield optimal performance. Importantly, the newest polarizing agents already feature all of the qualities of the optimal polarizing agent, leaving little room for further improvement. Further research into DNP polarizing agents should then target non-nitroxide radicals, as well as improvements in sample formulations to advance high-temperature DNP and limit quenching and reactivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据