4.6 Article

Prevalence of depression and past suicide attempt in primary care

期刊

ASIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
卷 27, 期 -, 页码 48-52

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2017.02.008

关键词

Depression; Suicide attempt; Prevalence; Primary care

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: It is known that persons who die by suicide commonly visit a primary care physician (PCP) shortly before the fatal act. There is little information on history of suicide attempt in depressed patients who consult PCPs for non-mental health indications. This information is important because past history of suicide attempt is a known predictor of future suicide risk. Objective: To estimate the prevalence of depression among outpatients in primary care and to determine the prevalence and determinants of past suicide attempt among them. Method: This cross-sectional study was conducted in six primary care settings, both public and private, in Kerala, India. A psychiatrist evaluated adult outpatients (n = 827), diagnosed depression using ICD-10 Diagnostic Criteria for Research, and elicited history of suicide attempt. Results: Overall depression prevalence was 27.2% and was higher in women. Past suicide attempt was identified in 6.9% (95% CI, 5.17-8.63%) of all outpatients; higher in women (9.2%) than men (3.6%). Among the depressed, 21.3% had previously attempted suicide; while this figure was 1.5% in the non-depressed. The prevalence of current depression was 81% (severe depression, 61%) in patients reporting past suicide attempts. In univariate analyses, female gender, perceived financial stress, and being depressed were significantly associated with past suicide attempts. In multivariate analysis, current depression was the largest predictor of past suicide attempt (adjusted odds ratio, 14.3; 95% CI, 6.60-31.07). Conclusion: Depression and suicide attempt are both common in primary care. Depression is the single most important predictor of suicide attempt. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据