4.8 Article

Synthetic microparticles conjugated with VEGF165 improve the survival of endothelial progenitor cells via microRNA-17 inhibition

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-00746-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. FEDER (Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional) through COMPETE
  2. FCT (Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia) [PTDC/BIM-MED/1118/2012]
  3. ERA Chair ERA@UC through European Union [669088]
  4. FCT [SFRH/BD/42871/2008, SFRH/BPD/105172/2014]
  5. BHF [SS/CH/15/1/31199]
  6. Leducq Foundation Transatlantic Network
  7. MIRVAD [13 CVD 02]
  8. BHF Regenerative Medicine Centers [RM/13/2/30158]
  9. British Heart Foundation [RG/15/5/31446] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/BIM-MED/1118/2012, SFRH/BPD/105172/2014, SFRH/BD/42871/2008] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several cell-based therapies are under pre-clinical and clinical evaluation for the treatment of ischemic diseases. Poor survival and vascular engraftment rates of transplanted cells force them to work mainly via time-limited paracrine actions. Although several approaches, including the use of soluble vascular endothelial growth factor (sVEGF)-VEGF165, have been developed in the last 10 years to enhance cell survival, they showed limited efficacy. Here, we report a pro-survival approach based on VEGF-immobilized microparticles (VEGF-MPs). VEGF-MPs prolong VEGFR-2 and Akt phosphorylation in cord blood-derived late outgrowth endothelial progenitor cells (OEPCs). In vivo, OEPC aggregates containing VEGF-MPs show higher survival than those treated with sVEGF. Additionally, VEGF-MPs decrease miR-17 expression in OEPCs, thus increasing the expression of its target genes CDKN1A and ZNF652. The therapeutic effect of OEPCs is improved in vivo by inhibiting miR-17. Overall, our data show an experimental approach to improve therapeutic efficacy of proangiogenic cells for the treatment of ischemic diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据