4.6 Article

Carbon nanofiber-supported PdNi alloy nanoparticles as highly efficient bifunctional catalysts for hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 246, 期 -, 页码 17-26

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.06.047

关键词

PdNi alloy nanoparticles; carbon nanofibers; bifunctional electrocatalysts; hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51573166]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LQ16E020005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Efficient bifunctional electrocatalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) must be developed to realize an inexpensive water-splitting system for large-scale applications. Herein, a novel PdNi carbon nanofiber (PdNi/CNF) catalyst was synthesized by facile electrospinning and carbonization processes. The size and homogeneity of the Pd-Ni alloy nanoparticles (NPs) could be effectively tuned by controlling the molar feed ratio of metal precursors. The morphology and structure of the PdNi/CNFs were characterized, and the working electrodes fabricated from the prepared catalyst mats were directly employed in the HER and OER. The PdNi/CNFs-1:2 catalyst exhibits high catalytic activity in the HER with a low overpotential of 55 mV at a current density of 10 mA cm(-2) in an acidic solution. Moreover, under 1 M KOH electrolyte, an overpotential of 187 mV is required in the HER over the catalyst to arrive 10 mA cm(-2) and an overpotential of 289 mV is achieved in the OER at the same current density. The superior HER and OER activities of the PdNi/CNFs are attributed to the synergistic effects of the PdNi alloy nanoparticles (NPs) assembled on the CNFs. This work provides a simple route for synthesizing highly efficient bifunctional electrocatalysts from 3d transition metals and a small amount of noble metals for hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据