4.6 Article

The Association Between Urban Tree Cover and Gun Assault: A Case-Control and Case-Crossover Study

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 186, 期 3, 页码 289-296

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwx096

关键词

firearm violence; green space exposure; gun assault; urban tree canopy

资金

  1. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development) [R01AA014944, K02AA017974]
  2. US Forest Service, Northern Research Station

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Green space and vegetation may play a protective role against urban violence. We investigated whether being near urban tree cover during outdoor activities was related to being assaulted with a gun. We conducted geographic information systems-assisted interviews with boys and men aged 10-24 years in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, including 135 patients who had been shot with a firearm and 274 community controls, during 2008-2011. Each subject reported a step-by-step mapped account of where and with whom they traveled over a full day from waking until being assaulted or going to bed. Geocoded path points were overlaid on mapped layers representing tree locations and place-specific characteristics. Conditional logistic regressions were used to compare case subjects versus controls (case-control) and case subjects at the time of injury versus times earlier that day (case-crossover). When comparing cases at the time of assault to controls matched at the same time of day, being under tree cover was inversely associated with gunshot assault (odds ratio (OR) = 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.55, 0.88), especially in low-income areas (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.54, 0.87). Case-crossovermodels confirmed this inverse association overall (OR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.34, 0.89) and in low-income areas (OR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.33, 0.88). Urban greening and tree cover may hold promise as proactive strategies to decrease urban violence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据