4.7 Article

Effect of PCM thickness and melting temperature on thermal performance of double glazing units

期刊

JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 87-95

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2017.04.005

关键词

Double glazing unit; PCM; Thermal performance; PCM thickness

资金

  1. Guided Innovation Foundation of Northeast Petroleum University [2016YDL-01]
  2. National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51306031]
  3. Guided Science and Technology Plan of Daqing [zd-2016-128]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The phase change material (PCM) applied in the glazing unit is an effective approach to decrease the building energy consumption and improve the utilization efficiency of solar energy, which makes a better thermal performance of glazing. In the present work, thermal performance of a PCM-filled double glazing unit with different thickness of phase change material in winter was investigated numerically in the cold area of Northeast China with the melting temperature 14-16 degrees C, 16-18 degrees C and 18-20 degrees C. The validation of the calculation model with experimental data was accomplished, and a good agreement of the temperature field between simulations and experimental data can be found. Then effect of thickness and melting temperature of PCM on thermal performance of double glazing units was investigated and the relevant parameters were analyzed. The results show that the interior surface temperature increases by 158.7%, the total transmitted energy decreases by 109.1% and the transmitted solar energy decreases by 86.1% when PCM thickness is 50 mm, compared with its thickness 4 mm. With the increasing of PCM melting temperature, its utilization decreases. When the thickness increases from 4 mm to 30 mm, the liquid fraction increases, but the condition is reverse when it continues to increase to 50 mm. So considering all parameters, the thickness 12-30 mm and the melting temperature 14-16 degrees C is recommended in Northeast China.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据