4.4 Review

Antagonism between Hedgehog and Wnt signaling pathways regulates tumorigenicity

期刊

ONCOLOGY LETTERS
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 6327-6333

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.7030

关键词

Hedgehog signaling pathway; Wnt signaling pathway; interaction; secreted frizzled-related protein 1

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81270598, 81473486]
  2. National Public Health Grand Research Foundation [201202017]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [2009ZRB14176, ZR2012HZ003]
  4. Technology Development Projects of Shandong Province [2010GSF10250, 2014GSF118021]
  5. Program of Shandong Medical Leading Talent
  6. Taishan Scholar Foundation of Shandong Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The crosstalk of multiple cellular signaling pathways is crucial in animal development and tissue homeostasis, and its dysregulation may result in tumor formation and metastasis. The Hedgehog (Hh) and Wnt signaling pathways are both considered to be essential regulators of cell proliferation, differentiation and oncogenesis. Recent studies have indicated that the Hh and Wnt signaling pathways are closely associated and involved in regulating embryogenesis and cellular differentiation. Hh signaling acts upstream of the Wnt signaling pathway, and negative regulates Wnt activity via secreted frizzled-related protein 1 (SFRP1), and the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway downregulates Hh activity through glioma-associated oncogene homolog 3 transcriptional regulation. This evidence suggests that the imbalance of Hh and Wnt regulation serves a crucial role in cancer-associated processes. The activation of SFRP1, which inhibits Wnt, has been demonstrated to be an important cross-point between the two signaling pathways. The present study reviews the complex interaction between the Hh and Wnt signaling pathways in embryogenesis and tumorigenicity, and the role of SFRP1 as an important mediator associated with the dysregulation of the Hh and Wnt signaling pathways.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据