4.6 Article

Microbial Impact on Host Metabolism: Opportunities for Novel Treatments of Nutritional Disorders?

期刊

MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM
卷 5, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/microbiolspec.BAD-0002-2016

关键词

-

资金

  1. FNRS [J.0084.15]
  2. PDR (Projet de Recherche) [T.0138.14]
  3. ARC (Action de Recherche Concertee-Communaute francaise de Belgique) [12/17-047]
  4. Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique-FNRS for the FRFS-WELBIO [WELBIO-CR-2012S-02R]
  5. Funds Baillet Latour
  6. ERC (European Research Council) [336452-ENIGMO]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Malnutrition is the cause of major public health concerns worldwide. On the one hand, obesity and associated pathologies (also known as the metabolic syndrome) affect more than 10% of the world population. Such pathologies might arise from an elevated inflammatory tone. We have discovered that the inflammatory properties of high-fat diets were linked to the translocation of lipopolysaccharide (LPS). We proposed a mechanism associating the gut microbiota with the onset of insulin resistance and low-grade inflammation, a phenomenon that we called metabolic endotoxemia. We and others have shown that bacteria as well as host-derived immune-related elements control microbial communities and eventually contribute to the phenotype observed during diet-induced obesity, diabetes, and metabolic inflammation. On the other hand, undernutrition is one of the leading causes of death in children. A diet poor in energy and/ or nutrients causes incomplete development of the gut microbiota and may profoundly affect energy absorption, initiating stunted growth, edema, and diarrhea. In this review, we discuss how changes in microbiota composition are associated with obesity and undernutrition. We also highlight that opposite consequences exist in terms of energy absorption from the diet (obesity versus undernutrition), but interestingly the two situations share similar defects in term of diversity, functionality, and inflammatory potential.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据