4.4 Article

IRF6 Expression in Basal Epithelium Partially Rescues Irf6 Knockout Mice

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL DYNAMICS
卷 246, 期 9, 页码 670-681

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/DVDY.24537

关键词

IRF6; GRHL3; cleft lip and palate; Van der Woude syndrome; popliteal pterygium syndrome; limb defects; genetic rescue; mouse models; epithelium; epidermis; oral periderm

资金

  1. NIH National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research [F31DE022696-01, DE13513]
  2. Michigan State University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Mutations in IRF6, CHUK (IKKA), and RIPK4 can lead to a disease spectrum that includes cutaneous, limb, and craniofacial malformations. Loss of these alleles in the mouse leads to perinatal lethality and severe cutaneous, limb, and craniofacial defects also. Genetic rescue in the mouse has been shown for Ikka and Ripk4. Results: Here, we show partial genetic rescue of Irf6 knockout embryos using the KRT14 promoter to drive Irf6 expression in the basal epithelium. In contrast to Irf6 knockout embryos, rescue embryos survive the immediate perinatal period. Macroscopic examination reveals rescue of skin adhesions between the axial and appendicular skeleton. Unexpectedly, KRT14-driven Irf6 expression does not completely rescue orofacial clefting and adhesions between the palate and tongue, suggesting the importance of cell-autonomous IRF6 expression in periderm. Like knockout embryos, Irf6 rescue embryos also have persistent esophageal adhesions, which likely contribute to postnatal demise. Conclusions: Together, these data suggest that targeted expression of IRF6 can significantly reduce disease severity, but that a minimum level of Irf6 in both periderm and basal epithelial cells is necessary for orofacial development. Therefore, homologous human and mouse phenotypes are observed for IRF6, IKKA, and RIPK4. In this work, we show that altering the expression level of IRF6 dramatically modified this phenotype in utero. (C) 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据