4.8 Article

Surface Heterostructure Induced by PrPO4 Modification in Li1.2 [Mn0.54Ni0.13Co0.13]O2 Cathode Material for High-Performance Lithium-Ion Batteries with Mitigating Voltage Decay

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 9, 期 33, 页码 27936-27945

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b07221

关键词

lithium-ion batteries; lithium-rich layered oxides; surface heterostructure; structural transformation; voltage decay

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51572024]
  2. Science and Technology Project of the State Grid Corporation of China [DG71-16-025]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium-rich layered oxides (LLOs) have been attractive cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries because of their high reversible capacity. However, they suffer from low initial Coulombic efficiency and capacity/voltage decay upon cycling. Herein, facile surface modification of Li1.2Mn0.54Ni0.13Co0.13O2 cathode material is designed to overcome these defects by the protective effect of a surface heterostructure composed of an induced spinel layer and a PrPO4 modification layer. As anticipated, a sample modified with 3 wt % PrPO4 (PrP3) shows an enhanced initial Coulombic efficiency of 90% compared to 81.8% for the pristine one, more excellent cycling stability with a capacity retention of 89.3% after 100 cycles compared to only 71.7% for the pristine one, and less average discharge voltage fading from 0.6353 to 0.2881 V. These results can be attributed to the fact that the modification nanolayers have moved amounts of oxygen and lithium from the lattice in the bulk crystal structure, leading to a chemical activation of the Li2MnO3 component previously and forming a spinel interphase with a 3D fast Li+ diffusion channel and stable structure. Moreover, the elaborate surface heterostructure on a lithium-rich cathode material can effectively curb the undesired side reactions with the electrolyte and may also extend to other layered oxides to improve their cycling stability at high voltage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据