4.4 Article

Influence of masticatory function, dental caries and socioeconomic status on the body mass index of preschool children

期刊

ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY
卷 81, 期 -, 页码 69-73

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.04.032

关键词

Pediatric obesity; Mastication; Dental caries; Socioeconomic factors; Body mass index

资金

  1. Brazilian Coordination of Higher Education, Ministry of Education (CAPES)
  2. Research Foundation of the State of Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)
  3. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPQ), Brazil

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the influence of masticatory function, dental caries and socioeconomic status on the body mass index (BMI) of preschool children. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with a sample of 285 children aged three to five years allocated to three groups based on the BMI: underweight, ideal weight and overweight/obesity. Socioeconomic status was determined based on the responses of parents/caregivers to a specific form. Cavitated lesions were diagnosed using the criteria of the International Caries Detection and Assessment System. Masticatory function was assessed based on masticatory performance (MP) and the swallowing threshold (ST), which were evaluated based on the results of a test food. Data analysis involved the employment of the Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney and chi-square tests as well as simple and multiple linear regression analyses. Results: In the final multiple regression model, BMI was influenced by monthly household income (13 = 0.234; 95%CI: 1.014 to 1.647), number of cavitated teeth (beta = -0.180; 95%CI: -0.293 to -0.054) and X50 of the ST (13 = 0.304; 95%CI: 0.213-0.498). Conclusion: Children whose food test resulted in large particles and those from families with a higher monthly income had a higher BMI. Children with a greater number of teeth with cavitated dental caries had a lower BMI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据