4.5 Article

Long-term cytokine and growth factor release from equine platelet-rich fibrin clots obtained with two different centrifugation protocols

期刊

CYTOKINE
卷 97, 期 -, 页码 149-155

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cyto.2017.06.011

关键词

Platelet-rich fibrin; Cytokines; Growth factors; Horse; Wound healing; Platelet concentrate

资金

  1. Vicerrectoria de Investigaciones y Postgrados of the Universidad de Caldas, Manizales, Colombia [0426415]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To compare the temporal release (over three weeks) of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin 4 (IL-4), IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra), platelet-derived growth factor BB (PDGF-BB) and transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGF-beta(1)) from two platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) preparations from equine blood obtained at either 240 g/8 min or 416 g/10 min. Methods: Whole blood from 10 horses was used to obtain PRF clots by two different centrifugation protocols. After 1 h of rest, PRF clots were deposited in wells with culture medium, which was changed at 6 h, 24 h and then every 48 h to 21 days. Cytokines and GFs were measured by ELISA at 1 h (serum supernatants from PRF clots) and all time points of culture medium change. A negative control (plasma) and a positive control (blood lysate) were also included. Results: There were no relevant differences between the two protocols for the temporal release of proteins. However, a significant (p = 0.01) effect of time was noted. All cytokines were detected after 6 h of PRF clot culture until day 21. GF were detected at 1 h until day 21. The concentrations for these proteins diminished gradually over time. A highly significant (p = 0.01) correlation was noticed between all the proteins evaluated. Conclusions: Leukocytes enmeshed in PRF clots were able to produce cytokines, TGF-beta(1) and PDGF-BB. These findings demonstrate a paramount role of leukocytes in wound healing induced or modified by PRF clots in mammals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据