4.4 Article

Phascolarctobacterium faecium abundant colonization in human gastrointestinal tract

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE
卷 14, 期 4, 页码 3122-3126

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/etm.2017.4878

关键词

Phascolarctobacterium faecium; real-time polymerase chain reaction; colonization rate; age-related distribution; gut microbiota

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81441066]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [S2013010014850]
  3. Guangdong Provincial Department of Science and Technology [2015A020213002]
  4. Guangzhou Kangze Medical Science and Technology Co., Ltd fund [201511]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phascolarctobacterium can produce short-chain fatty acids, including acetate and propionate, and can be associated with the metabolic state and mood of the host. The present study investigated the colonization characteristics of Phascolarctobacterium faecium in healthy individuals < 1-80 years old in Southern China. A total of 150 fresh fecal samples were collected, and bacterial DNA was isolated from these samples for quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis. Phascolarctobacterium faecium demonstrated a high colonization rate and abundant colonization in the human gastrointestinal tract. The colonization rate varied between 43.33-93.33%, and the abundance of Phascolarctobacterium faecium ranged between 3.22-5.76 log cells g-1 (< 1 years old) and 3.06-9.33 log cells g-1 (> 1 year old). The permillage of Phascolarctobacterium faecium in total bacteria ranged between 0.004-1.479. There was presence of Phascolarctobacterium faecium-like bacteria in younger individuals with a gradual increase in the number of bacteria maintained at a high level with increasing ages (between 1 and 60 years old), but with a decrease in elderly individuals (> 60 years old). The results of the present study demonstrated that Phascolarctobacterium faecium is abundantly colonized in the human gastrointestinal tract.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据