4.4 Article

Effect of OPG gene mutation on protein expression and biological activity in osteoporosis

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 1475-1480

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/etm.2017.4712

关键词

osteoporosis; gene mutation; polymorphism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of an osteoprotegerin (OPG) gene mutation was investigated on its protein expression and biological activity in osteoporosis. The pcDNA3.0-OPG plasmid or wild-type plasmid were transfected into HEK293 cells. Osteoclast tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining and counting were then performed, and the expression of genes related to osteoclast differentiation and activation were measured by RT-PCR. The wild-type or mutant-type OPG at concentrations of 0, 10, 20, 50 and 100 ng/ml were added respectively to RAW264.7 cells and incubated for 24 h. The viability of cells treated with the wild-type and mutant-type OPG at a concentration of 100 ng/ml was still over 99%, which indicated that the wild-type and mutant-type OPG at this concentration had no cytotoxic effect on RAW264.7 cells. The number of TRAP-positive cells decreased with increasing concentration of wild-type or mutant-type OPG. At the concentrations of 20, 50 and 100 ng/ml, the inhibitory effect of wild-type OPG was significantly higher than that of mutant-type OPG (p<0.05). Both mutant-type and wild-type OPG inhibited the bone resorption activity of osteoclasts, and the inhibitory effect of wild-type OPG was significantly higher than that of mutant-type OPG at the concentrations of 20, 50 and 100 ng/ml (p<0.05). The levels of TRAP and RANK mRNA in the wild-type OPG treatment group were significantly lower than those in the control group, while the levels of TRAP and RANK mRNA in the mutant-type OPG treatment group were significantly lower than those in the wild-type group (p<0.05). The genetic mutation did not affect the protein expression levels of OPG, but inhibited the normal activity of OPG.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据