4.7 Article

Computation of fluid flow and pore-space properties estimation on micro-CT images of rock samples

期刊

COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES
卷 106, 期 -, 页码 118-129

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2017.06.009

关键词

Digital rock physics; Permeability estimation; Carbonate; Finite-Volume SIMPLE; Two-point correlation; Micro-Computer Tomography

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/I010971/1]
  2. NSFC China
  3. EPSRC [EP/I010971/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I010971/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurate determination of the petrophysical properties of rocks, namely REV, mean pore and grain size and absolute permeability, is essential for a broad range of engineering applications. Here, the petrophysical properties of rocks are calculated using an integrated approach comprising image processing, statistical correlation and numerical simulations. The Stokes equations of creeping flow for incompressible fluids are solved using the Finite-Volume SIMPLE algorithm. Simulations are then carried out on three-dimensional digital images obtained from micro-CT scanning of two rock formations: one sandstone and one carbonate. Permeability is predicted from the computed flow field using Darcy's law. It is shown that REV, REA and mean pore and grain size are effectively estimated using the two-point spatial correlation function. Homogeneity and anisotropy are also evaluated using the same statistical tools. A comparison of different absolute permeability estimates is also presented, revealing a good agreement between the numerical value and the experimentally determined one for the carbonate sample, but a large discrepancy for the sandstone. Finally, a new convergence criterion for the SIMPLE algorithm, and more generally for the family of pressure-correction methods, is presented. This criterion is based on satisfaction of bulk momentum balance, which makes it particularly useful for pore-scale modelling of reservoir rocks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据