4.8 Article

Direct Laser Writing of Tubular Microtowers for 3D Culture of Human Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Neuronal Cells

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 9, 期 31, 页码 25717-25730

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b05536

关键词

direct laser writing; two photon polymerization; microstructures; 3D culture platform; neurons; orientation of neurites

资金

  1. TEKES (Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation) Human Spare Parts project
  2. Finnish Cultural Foundation [00141012, 00140325, 00150312]
  3. Academy of Finland [267471]
  4. Paulo Foundation
  5. Academy of Finland (AKA) [267471, 267471] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As the complex structure of nervous tissue cannot be mimicked in two-dimensional (2D) cultures, the development of three-dimensional (3D) neuronal cell culture platforms is a topical issue in the field of neuroscience and neural tissue engineering. Computer-assisted laser-based fabrication techniques such as direct laser writing by two-photon polymerization (2PP-DLW) offer a versatile tool to fabricate 3D cell culture platforms with highly ordered geometries in the size scale of natural 3D cell environments. In this study, we present the design and 2PP-DLW fabrication process of a novel 3D neuronal cell culture platform based on tubular microtowers. The platform facilitates efficient long-term 3D culturing of human neuronal cells and supports neurite orientation and 3D network formation. Microtower designs both with or without intraluminal guidance cues and/or openings in the tower wall are designed and successfully fabricated from Ormocomp. Three of the microtower designs are chosen for the final culture platform: a design with openings in the wall and intralumial guidance cues (webs and pillars), a design with openings but without intraluminal structures, and a plain cylinder design. The proposed culture platform offers a promising concept for future 3D cultures in the field of neuroscience.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据