4.4 Article

Formulation and characterization of novel soft nanovesicles for enhanced transdermal delivery of eprosartan mesylate

期刊

SAUDI PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL
卷 25, 期 7, 页码 1040-1046

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2017.01.006

关键词

Eprosartan mesylate; Transdermal; Nano-transfersomes; Confocal laser scanning microscopy

资金

  1. National Plan for Science, Technology and Innovation (MAARIFAH), King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [13-NAN1268-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of the present work was to formulate, optimize and evaluate the potential of novel soft nanovesicles i.e. nano-transfersomes, containing eprosartan mesylate (EM) for transdermal delivery. Nano-transfersomes of EM were developed using Phospholipon 90G, Span 80 (SP) and sodium deoxycholate (SDC) and characterized for vesicle size, shape, entrapment efficiency, in vitro skin permeation study and confocal laser scanning microscopy. The optimized nano-transfersomes formulation showed vesicles size of 108.53 +/- 0.06 nm and entrapment efficiency of 63.00 +/- 2.76%. The optimized nano-transfersomes provided an improved transdermal flux of 27.22 +/- 0.29 mu g/cm(2)/h with an enhancement ratio of 16.80 over traditional liposomes through Wistar rat skin. Confocal laser microscopy of rat skin treated with the optimized formulation showed that the formulation was eventually distributed and permeated deep into the rat skin. The present investigation has shown that the nature and concentration of surfactants (edge activators) influence immense control on the characteristics of nano-transfersomes. It was concluded that the developed nano-transfersomes surmount the limitation of low penetration ability of the traditional liposomes across the rat skin. Improved drug delivery presented by nano-transfersomes establishes this system as an encouraging dosage form for the delivery of EM via skin route. (C) 2017 The Authors. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据