4.4 Article

Hybrid polymeric matrices for oral modified release of Desvenlafaxine succinate tablets

期刊

SAUDI PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL
卷 25, 期 5, 页码 676-687

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2016.10.005

关键词

Desvenlafaxine succinate; Controlled release matrix; Apparent permeability coefficient; Everted sac

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Desvenlafaxine succinate (DSV) is a water soluble anti-depressant drug, which is rapidly absorbed after oral administration exaggerating its side effects. The current work aimed to prepare controllable release DSV matrix to reduce DSV side effects related to its initial burst. Methods: Fifteen DSV matrix formulations were prepared using different polymers, polymer/drug ratios and matrix excipients and characterized using Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC), infrared (IR) spectroscopy, water uptake and in vitro DSV release. The release kinetics were calculated to determine the drug release mechanism. Ex-vivo DSV absorption via rat intestinal mucosal cells and the calculation of the apparent permeability coefficient (P-app) were performed using everted sac technique. Results: Maltodextrin was the best matrix excipient (F7 and F10) showing acceptable decrease in the initial burst compared to the innovator. The addition of negatively charged polymers sodium carboxy methyl cellulose (SCMC) or sodium alginate resulted in an interaction that was proved by DSC and IR findings. This interaction slowed DSV release. F10 showed an excellent absorption of more than 80% of DSV after 4 h and the highest similarity factor with the innovator (84.7). Conclusion: A controllable release pattern of DSV was achieved using Methocel, Maltodextrin and SCMC. The obtained results could be used as a platform to control the release of cationic water soluble drugs that suffer from side effects associated with their initial burst after oral administration. (C) 2016 The Authors. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据