4.1 Review

Lymphoma classification update: T-cell lymphomas, Hodgkin lymphomas, and histiocytic/dendritic cell neoplasms

期刊

EXPERT REVIEW OF HEMATOLOGY
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 239-249

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2017.1281122

关键词

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma; peripheral T-cell lymphoma; anaplastic large cell lymphoma; angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma; T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder; Hodgkin lymphoma; histiocytic sarcoma; dendritic cell tumors; lymphoma classification; World Health Organization (WHO)

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute [R01 CA177734]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Lymphomas are classified based on the normal counterpart, or cell of origin, from which they arise. Because lymphocytes have physiologic immune functions that vary both by lineage and by stage of differentiation, the classification of lymphomas arising from these normal lymphoid populations is complex. Recent genomic data have contributed additional depth to this complexity. Areas covered: Lymphoma classification follows the World Health Organization ( WHO) system, which reflects international consensus and is based on pathological, genetic, and clinical factors. The present review focuses on the classification of T-cell lymphomas, Hodgkin lymphomas, and histiocytic and dendritic cell neoplasms, summarizing changes reflected in the 2016 revision to the WHO classification. These changes are critical to hematologists and other clinicians who care for patients with these disorders. Expert commentary: Lymphoma classification is a continually evolving field that needs to be responsive to new clinical, pathological, and molecular understanding of lymphoid neoplasia. Among the entities covered in this review, the 2016 revisions in the WHO classification particularly impact T-cell lymphomas, including a new umbrella category of T-follicular helper cell-derived lymphomas and evolving recognition of indolent T-cell lymphomas and lymphoproliferative disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据