4.4 Article

Fatigue and self-care in patients with chronic heart failure

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING
卷 15, 期 5, 页码 337-344

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1474515115575834

关键词

Fatigue; compliance; self care; heart failure; sleep; depression

资金

  1. VICI grant from the Dutch Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [453-04-004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Fatigue is a debilitating and highly prevalent symptom in patients with chronic heart failure (HF) possibly complicating HF self-care behaviour which is crucial for maintaining health. Aims: The purpose of this study was to examine whether general and exertion fatigue are distinctively associated with self-care in patients with chronic HF. Methods: In total, 545 outpatients with chronic HF (mean age=66.2 years; 75% male) completed measures of general fatigue (i.e. a sustained sense of exhaustion including mental efforts), exertion fatigue (i.e. fatigue directly related to physical activity), sleep problems, mood symptoms and HF self-care behaviour at baseline, 12-, and 18-month follow-up. Results: Linear mixed modelling results showed that general and exertion fatigue were significantly associated with poor HF self-care (estimate=0.10, p=0.004; estimate=0.06, p=0.01, respectively) and poor consulting behaviour (estimate=0.05, p=0.04; estimate=0.04, p=0.007, respectively) over time, independent of sleep and mood problems, and other clinical covariates. Exertion fatigue was associated with supplementary determinants. Conclusion: This is the first prospective study demonstrating that general and exertion fatigue were both associated with poor HF self-care, which could not be explained by sleep problems or mood symptoms, and was independent of clinical indicators of disease severity. Treatment of fatigue problems may improve HF self-care skills and ultimately quality of life and cardiovascular outcomes. Further research is needed to examine this potential causal relationship.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据