4.7 Article

Response surface methodology for the optimum production of biodiesel over Cr/Ca/γ-Al2O3 catalyst: Catalytic performance and physicochemical studies

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 113, 期 -, 页码 697-705

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.06.007

关键词

Response surface methodology; Biodiesel; Bimetallic oxide; Catalytic activity; Transesterification

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Malaysia
  2. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) through FRGS Grant [4F740]
  3. MOSTI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Attention continues to be focused on biomass as a very promising alternative source of renewable materials for energy production. This research focused on the use of a heterogeneous base alkaline earth metal oxide incorporated with a transition metal oxide catalyst supported on gamma alumina oxide varied with different temperatures, Cr loading and number of alumina coatings that make the biodiesel easily separated, low cost and environmental friendly. The physicochemical properties of Cr/Ca(10:90)/gamma-Al2O3 catalyst calcined at 700 degrees C investigated by BET surface area and CO2-TPD indicated high surface area, 164.32 m(2)/g and higher basicity, 3.38 mmol/g, respectively. FESEM-EDX mapping showed the homogeneous distribution of each element presence in Cr/Ca(10:90)/gamma-Al2O3 catalyst was well-distributed and indicated that the Cr/Ca has a higher dispersion on the surface of the gamma-Al2O3. The response surface methodology was used to optimize the catalytic activity of Cr/Ca/gamma-Al2O3 catalyst for transesterification of biodiesel from low-grade cooking oil. The most important variable for biodiesel yield was the calcination temperature of the catalyst followed by the Cr loading and the number of alumina coatings. The experimental value achieved with 93.10% conversion of biodiesel closely agreed with the predicted result from RSM and validated the findings of response surface optimization. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据