4.5 Article

Design Principles of Phosphorylation-Dependent Timekeeping in Eukaryotic Circadian Clock

期刊

出版社

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a028357

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED)-Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST), CREST, Brain Mapping by Integrated Neurotechnologies for Disease Studies (Brain/MINDS)
  2. Basic Science and Platform Technology Program for Innovative Biological Medicine, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [25221004, 23115006, 25830146, 16K14653]
  3. Rikagaku Kenkyusho (Institute of Physical and Chemical Research, Japan-RIKEN)
  4. Takeda Science Foundation
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25830146, 16K14653] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The circadian clock in cyanobacteria employs a posttranslational oscillator composed of a sequential phosphorylation-dephosphorylation cycle of KaiC protein, in which the dynamics of protein structural changes driven by temperature-compensated KaiC's ATPase activity are critical for determining the period. On the other hand, circadian clocks in eukaryotes employ transcriptional feedback loops as a core mechanism. In this system, the dynamics of protein accumulation and degradation affect the circadian period. However, recent studies of eukaryotic circadian clocks reveal that the mechanism controlling the circadian period can be independent of the regulation of protein abundance. Instead, the circadian substrate is often phosphorylated at multiple sites at flexible protein regions to induce structural changes. The phosphorylation is catalyzed by kinases that induce sequential multisite phosphorylation such as casein kinase 1 (CK1) with temperature-compensated activity. We propose that the design principles of phosphorylation-dependent circadian-period determination in eukaryotes may share characteristics with the posttranslational oscillator in cyanobacteria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据