4.6 Article

Fractional S-duality, classification of fractional topological insulators, and surface topological order

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 96, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.085125

关键词

-

资金

  1. University's Research Fund [15XNFL19]
  2. NSF of China [11574392]
  3. Major State Research Development Program of China [2016YFA0300500]
  4. National Science Foundation at the University of Illinois [DMR 1408713]
  5. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation EPiQS Initiative [GBMF4305]
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Materials Research [1408713] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we propose a generalization of the S-duality of four-dimensional quantum electrodynamics (QED4) to QED4 with fractionally charged excitations, the fractional S-duality. Such QED4 can be obtained by gauging the U(1) symmetry of a topologically ordered state with fractional charges. When time-reversal symmetry is imposed, the axion angle (theta) can take a nontrivial but still time-reversal-invariant value pi/t(2) (t is an element of Z). Here, 1/t specifies the minimal electric charge carried by bulk excitations. Such states with time-reversal and U(1) global symmetry (fermion number conservation) are fractional topological insulators (FTIs). We propose a topological quantum field theory description, which microscopically justifies the fractional S-duality. Then, we consider stacking operations (i.e.,a direct sum of Hamiltonians) among FTIs. We find that there are two topologically distinct classes of FTIs: type I and type II. Type I (t is an element of Z(odd)) can be obtained by directly stacking a noninteracting topological insulator and a fractionalized gapped fermionic state with minimal charge 1/t and vanishing theta. But type II (t is an element of Zeven) cannot be realized through any stacking. Finally, we study the surface topological order of fractional topological insulators.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据