4.7 Article

Identification of preclinical Alzheimer's disease by a profile of pathogenic proteins in neurally derived blood exosomes: A case-control study

期刊

ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA
卷 11, 期 6, 页码 600-607

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.06.008

关键词

Preclinical AD; Neural exosomes; P-Tau; A beta 1-42; Biomarkers

资金

  1. Intramural Research Program of the National Institute on Aging (NIA)
  2. NIA from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [RO1AG030753]
  3. UK ADC [P30 AG028383]
  4. Nanosomix, Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Proteins pathogenic in Alzheimer's disease (AD) were extracted from neurally derived blood exosomes and quantified to develop biomarkers for the staging of sporadic AD. Methods: Blood exosomes obtained at one time-point from patients with AD (n = 57) or frontotemporal dementia (FTD) (n = 16), and at two time-points from others (n = 24) when cognitively normal and 1 to 10 years later when diagnosed with AD were enriched for neural sources by immunoabsorption. AD-pathogenic exosomal proteins were extracted and quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Results: Mean exosomal levels of total tau, P-T181-tau, P-S396-tau, and amyloid beta 1-42 (A beta 1-42) for AD and levels of P-T181-tau and A beta 1-42 for FTD were significantly higher than for case-controls. Step-wise discriminant modeling incorporated P-T181-tau, P-S396-tau, and A beta 1-42 in AD, but only P-T181-tau in FTD. Classification of 96.4% of AD patients and 87.5% of FTD patients was correct. In 24 AD patients, exosomal levels of P-S396-tau, P-T181-tau, and A beta 1-42 were significantly higher than for controls both 1 to 10 years before and when diagnosed with AD. Conclusions: Levels of P-S396-tau, P-T181-tau, and A beta 1-42 in extracts of neurally derived blood exosomes predict the development of AD up to 10 years before clinical onset. (C) 2015 The Alzheimer's Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据