4.2 Article

The effect of tinnitus retraining therapy on chronic tinnitus: A controlled trial

期刊

LARYNGOSCOPE INVESTIGATIVE OTOLARYNGOLOGY
卷 2, 期 4, 页码 166-177

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/lio2.76

关键词

tinnitus; chronic; randomized controlled trial; tinnitus; retraining therapy; hearing aids

资金

  1. Tinnitus Research Consortium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectivesThe goal of this study was to compare treatment outcomes for chronic bothersome tinnitus after Tinnitus Retraining Therapy (TRT) versus standard of care treatment (SC) and to determine the longevity of the effect over an 18-month period. Study DesignA randomized controlled trial comparing TRT to SC for chronic tinnitus. MethodsAdults with subjective, stable, bothersome chronic tinnitus associated with hearing loss amenable to aural rehabilitation with hearing aids were recruited. The Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) was the primary outcome measure and the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) the secondary outcome measure of tinnitus severity and impact. Data were collected at screening, entry (0 months), and 6, 12, and 18 months after the beginning of treatment, using an integrated digitized suite of evaluation modules. TRT consisted of directive counseling and acoustic enrichment using combination hearing aids and sound generators; SC consisted of general aural rehabilitation counseling and hearing aids. ResultsSignificant improvement in tinnitus impact occurred after both TRT and SC therapy, with a larger treatment effect obtained in the TRT group. Lasting therapeutic benefit was evident at 18 months in both groups. THI initial scores were unstable in 10% of enrolled participants, showing moderate bidirectional fluctuation between screening and baseline (0 month) assessment. ConclusionAdults with moderate to severe tinnitus and hearing loss amenable to amplification, benefit from either TRT or SC treatment when combined with hearing aid use. TRT benefit may exceed that of SC. The global improvement in tinnitus severity that accrued over an 18-month period appeared to be robust and clinically significant. Level of EvidenceI

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据