4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Automatic matching of surgeries to predict surgeons' next actions

期刊

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE
卷 81, 期 -, 页码 3-11

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2017.03.007

关键词

Temporal analysis; Dynamic time warping; Surgical process modelling; Surgery

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [DE170100037]
  2. Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Asian Office of Aerospace Research and Development (AOARD) [FA2386-16-1-4023]
  3. Australian Research Council [DE170100037] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: More than half a million surgeries are performed every day worldwide, which makes surgery one of the most important component of global health care. In this context, the objective of this paper is to introduce a new method for the prediction of the possible next task that a surgeon is going to perform during surgery. Material and Method: We formulate the problem as finding the optimal registration of a partial sequence to a complete reference sequence of surgical activities. We propose an efficient algorithm to find the optimal partial alignment and a prediction system using maximum a posteriori probability estimation and filtering. We also introduce a weighting scheme allowing to improve the predictions by taking into account the relative similarity between the current surgery and a set of pre-recorded surgeries. Results: Our method is evaluated on two types of neurosurgical procedures: lumbar disc herniation removal and anterior cervical discectomy. Results show that our method outperformed the state of the art by predicting the next task that the surgeon will perform with 95% accuracy. Conclusions: This work shows that, even from the low-level description of surgeries and without other sources of information, it is often possible to predict the next surgical task when the conditions are consistent with the previously recorded surgeries. We also showed that our method is able to assess when there is actually a large divergence between the predictions and decide that it is not reasonable to make a prediction. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据