4.2 Review

Management of mood and anxiety disorders in patients receiving opioid agonist therapy: Review and meta-analysis

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL ON ADDICTIONS
卷 26, 期 6, 页码 551-563

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ajad.12581

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and ObjectivesPatients with opioid use disorders and mood and anxiety symptoms have a variable prognosis. Few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated treatment of depression or anxiety in patients receiving opioid agonist therapies (OAT). This review evaluates studies of pharmacotherapy/psychotherapy for treating symptoms of depression or anxiety in patients receiving OAT. MethodsPublic databases were searched for clinical trials of pharmacotherapy or psychotherapy for managing depression or anxiety symptoms in adults receiving OAT. Subsequently, we conducted a random effects meta-analysis model of RCTs by antidepressants subclasses. ResultsIn our literature search, we identified 22 RCTs, eight of which were eligible for meta-analysis. Seven studies evaluated antidepressants in patients already maintained on OAT; two studies reported significant results for antidepressant effects versus placebo. Similarly, two of the seven studies that initiated antidepressants with OAT had advantages over placebo. Meta-analysis of grouped data revealed that tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) (n=235) significantly improved mean depression scores (SMD=-2.35, 95%CI: [-4.35, -0.34], z=-2.29, p=.022) while Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) (n=311) were not significantly different than placebo (SMD=0.47, 95%CI: [-0.35, 1.30], z=1.12, p=.263). Four out of five studies that implemented psychotherapeutic approaches reported a greater reduction of depressive symptoms than the comparison group. Conclusions and Scientific SignificanceTo date, psychotherapy has the most documented evidence for efficacy. TCAs appears effective but with more adverse effects than SSRIs. Further studies of OAT and adjunct antidepressant treatments for dual diagnosis patients are warranted. (Am J Addict 2017;26:551-563)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据