4.8 Article

Plant Habitat-Conscious White Light Emission of Dy3+ in Whitlockite-like Phosphates: Reduced Photosynthesis and Inhibition of Bloom Impediment

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 7, 期 38, 页码 21398-21407

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b06208

关键词

light emitting diodes; phosphors; luminescence; Dy3+; plant growth; photosynthesis; bloom impediment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It has been pointed out that agricultural crops and other natural plants may be damaged by outdoor lighting systems. Therefore, lighting that does not affect plant growth is needed. To address this problem, we have prepared a new whitlockite-like phosphate Dy-phosphor Ca8MgY1-x-yLaxDyy(PO4)(7), which exhibits a yellow-white Dy3+ luminescence that has a maximum internal quantum efficiency of 65.6% under a 387 nm excitation light for x = 0.10 and y = 0.05. The x dependence of IQE showed two maxima at x = 0.10-0.15 and 0.80-0.85, which could be due to the partial allowance of f-f forbidden transitions by local lattice distortion around the Dy3+ ions originating from the La incorporation at near end members of Ca8MgY1-x-yLaxDyy(PO4)(7). Concentration quenching occurred for x > 0.05. A white light-emitting diode (LED) was fabricated from a UV LED emitting at 385 nm and a Ca8MgY1-x-yLaxDyy(PO4)(7) phosphor (Dy-WLED) for which the CIE color coordinates and correlated color temperature were CIE(0.350,0.378) and 4919 K, respectively. Plant cultivation experiments on Chlorella photosynthetic growth and blooming of the short-day plant Cosmos were carried out using the prepared Dy-WLED and reference commercial LEDs. We found that the Dy-WLED substantially reduced the photosynthesis of Chlorella and inhibited bloom impediment in Cosmos. These effects originated especially from the reduction of red-near-IR emissions. Thus, we conclude that the Dy-WLED is a very promising candidate for plant habitat-conscious white LEDs for outdoor lights that can protect both natural plant habitats and crop yields.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据