4.2 Article

Who Really Wins? Efficacy of a Croatian Youth Gambling Prevention Program

期刊

JOURNAL OF GAMBLING STUDIES
卷 33, 期 3, 页码 1011-1033

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10899-017-9668-4

关键词

Prevention program; Evaluation; Youth gambling; Problem gambling; Adolescents

资金

  1. Ministry of Science, Education and Sports of the Republic of Croatia
  2. Education and Teacher Training Agency
  3. Croatian Lottery, Ltd.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reports on the development and pilot evaluation of a Croatian school-based youth gambling prevention program Who really wins?. The program is aimed at minimizing risk and enhancing protective factors related to youth gambling. A short-term evaluation of the program was conducted with a sample of 190 first and second year high-school students (67.6% boys, aged 14-17 years; average age 15.61). An experimental design with two groups (Training vs. No Training) and two measurement sessions (pre-test and post-test sessions) was used to evaluate change in problem gambling awareness, cognitive distortions, knowledge of the nature of random events as well as in social skills. Results showed significant changes in the post-test sessions, which can be attributed to changes in the Training group. We observed a decrease in risk factors, namely better knowledge about gambling and less gambling related cognitive distortions. Immediate effects on protective factors such as problem solving skills, refusal skills, and general self-efficacy were not observed. Findings also show program effects to be the same for both boys and girls, students from different types of schools, for those with different learning aptitudes, as well as for those at different risk levels with regard to their gambling, which speaks in favour of the program's universality. The program had no iatrogenic effects on behaviour change and shows promise as an effective tool for youth gambling prevention. Future research and a long-term evaluation are needed to determine whether the observed changes are also linked to behavioural change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据