4.6 Review

Exploiting Microstructural Instabilities in Solids and Structures: From Metamaterials to Structural Transitions

期刊

APPLIED MECHANICS REVIEWS
卷 69, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

ASME
DOI: 10.1115/1.4037966

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation, Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation (CAREER) [CMMI-1254424, CMMI-1149456]
  2. Division of Materials Research [DMR-1420570]
  3. Office of Naval Research [W911NF-17-1-0147]
  4. Directorate For Engineering
  5. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1254424] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Division Of Materials Research
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1420570] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Instabilities in solids and structures are ubiquitous across all length and time scales, and engineering design principles have commonly aimed at preventing instability. However, over the past two decades, engineering mechanics has undergone a paradigm shift, away from avoiding instability and toward taking advantage thereof. At the core of all instabilities-both at the microstructural scale in materials and at the macroscopic, structural level-lies a nonconvex potential energy landscape which is responsible, e.g., for phase transitions and domain switching, localization, pattern formation, or structural buckling and snapping. Deliberately driving a system close to, into, and beyond the unstable regime has been exploited to create new materials systems with superior, interesting, or extreme physical properties. Here, we review the state-of-the-art in utilizing mechanical instabilities in solids and structures at the microstructural level in order to control macroscopic (meta) material performance. After a brief theoretical review, we discuss examples of utilizing material instabilities (from phase transitions and ferroelectric switching to extreme composites) as well as examples of exploiting structural instabilities in acoustic and mechanical metamaterials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据