4.3 Article

Long-term graft survival in patients with chronic antibody-mediated rejection with persistent peritubular capillaritis treated with intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab

期刊

CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION
卷 31, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13037

关键词

intravenous immunoglobulin; kidney (allograft) function dysfunction; macrophage; monocyte biology; rejection: antibody-mediated; rejection: chronic

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
  2. Roche Australia
  3. Monash Postgraduate Scholarships

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic antibody-mediated rejection (cAMR) is the major cause of premature renal allograft loss and is resistant to therapy with 12-month graft failure of up to 50% reported. We examined the duration of graft survival and associates of graft failure in patients with donor-specific antibody-positive cAMR and treatment-resistant peritubular capillaritis between June 2007 and October 2010. Those with advanced interstitial fibrosis (n=5) were excluded. Included patients (n=24) received treatment with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin and fixed-dose rituximab (500mg). Compared with previous reports, the study group experienced prolonged graft survival (median 82.1months). Graft loss was predicted by eGFR and degree of proteinuria at diagnosis but not by donor-specific HLA antibody class or intensity, nor individual or summed Banff scores. Allograft biopsies were further examined for infiltrating leukocyte subtypes and location with high numbers of glomerular leukocytes, particularly macrophages, independently associated with an increased risk of graft failure. This study suggests that patients with cAMR and persistent microcirculatory inflammation, excluding those with advanced histological damage, can expect prolonged graft survival when treated with IVIg and rituximab. Trial level evidence is required to validate this observation. Further examination of the role of macrophages in cAMR is warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据