4.3 Article

Validation Study of Image-Based Fractional Flow Reserve During Coronary Angiography

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.005259

关键词

angiography; catheterization; microcirculation; tomography; workflow

资金

  1. CathWorks Ltd.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Fractional flow reserve (FFR), an index of the hemodynamic severity of coronary stenoses, is derived from invasive measurements and requires a pressure-monitoring guidewire and hyperemic stimulus. Angiography-derived FFR measurements (FFRangio) may have several advantages. The aim of this study is to assess the diagnostic performance and interobserver reproducibility of FFRangio in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Methods and Results-FFRangio is a computational method based on rapid flow analysis for the assessment of FFR. FFRangio uses the patient's hemodynamic data and routine angiograms to generate a complete 3-dimensional coronary tree with color-coded FFR values at any epicardial location. Hyperemic flow ratio is derived from an automatic resistance-based lumped model of the entire coronary tree. A total of 203 lesions were analyzed in 184 patients from 4 centers. Values derived using FFRangio ranged from 0.5 to 0.97 (median 0.85) and correlated closely (Spearman rho=0.90; P<0.001) with the invasive FFR measurements, which ranged from 0.5 to 1 (median 0.84). In Bland-Altman analyses, the 95% limits of agreement between these methods ranged from -0.096 to 0.112. Using an FFR cutoff value of 0.80, the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of FFRangio were 88%, 95%, and 93%, respectively. The intraclass coefficient between 2 blinded operators was 0.962 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.950 to 0.971, P<0.001. Conclusions-There is a high concordance between FFRangio and invasive FFR. The color-coded display of FFR values during coronary angiography facilitates the integration of physiology and anatomy for decision making on revascularization in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据