4.7 Article

Preparation of polyethylene membranes filled with crosslinked sulfonated polystyrene for cation exchange and transport in membrane capacitive deionization process

期刊

DESALINATION
卷 417, 期 -, 页码 87-93

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2017.05.008

关键词

Polyethylene; Ion-exchange membrane; Sulfonated polystyrene; Pore-filling polymerization; Membrane capacitive deionization

资金

  1. Radiation Technology R & D program through the National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Commercial ion-exchange membranes are usually thick, and have high electrical resistances that can reduce the adsorption capacity of electrodes in membrane capacitive deionization (MCDI) cells. In this study, porous polyethylene (PE) membranes, filled with a sulfonated monomer, crosslinking agent (5, 10, 15 wt%), and radical initiator, were subjected to polymerization and subsequent ion-exchange, to yield PE filled with crosslinked sulfonated polystyrene (PE-CSPS-5, 10, 15). PE-CSPS membranes were very thin (27 [un), and exhibited moderate water uptake (26-35 wt%) and ion-exchange capacity (0.70-1.0 meq/g), and low electrical resistances (0.33-0.62 Omega.cm(2)) compared with commercial ones. MCDI cells were assembled with either a PE-CSPS-5 membrane or a commercial cation-exchange membrane (CMX, IEC 1.5-1.8 meq/g), and their performances studied using a 500 ppm solution of NaCl. The current efficiency of the PE-CSPS-5-based MCDI cell showed slightly higher than that of the commercial CMX-based MCDI cell, which was attributed to the considerably lower electrical resistance of the membrane (0.33 vs. 2.9 Omega.cm(2)), even though its IEC value is smaller (1.0 vs. 1.5-1.8 meq/g). Our study reveals that supporting membranes filled with ion-exchange polymers have advantages over casting membranes in preparing membranes for MCDI application, with respect to dimentional stability and thickness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据