4.7 Review

A Comprehensive Review on the Main Honey Authentication Issues: Production and Origin

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.12278

关键词

analysis; authenticity; botanical and geographical origins; honey; production

资金

  1. FCT (Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia) [UID/QUI/50006/2013 - POCI/01/0145/FEDER/007265]
  2. FCT/MEC through national funds
  3. FEDER
  4. FOODINTEGRITY [613688]
  5. POPH-QREN - FSE [SFRH/BD/75091/2010]
  6. POPH-QREN - MCTES [SFRH/BD/75091/2010]
  7. [NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Honey is a highly consumed natural product, not only for its taste and nutritional value, but also for its health benefits. Owing to characteristics that are essentially or exclusively related to the specific region or particular local environment and flora, honey can be classified as a premium product generally perceived as a high-quality and valued product because of its desirable flavor and taste. Consequently, honey has been a target of adulteration through inappropriate/fraudulent production practices and mislabeling origin. Globally, authentication of honey covers 2 main aspects: the production, with main issues related to sugar syrup addition, filtration, thermal treatment, and water content; and the labeled origin (geographical and/or botanical) and organic provenance. This review addresses all those issues, focusing on the approaches to detect the different types of honey adulteration. Due to the complex nature of honey and to the different types of adulteration, its authentication has been challenging and prompted the development of several advanced analytical approaches. Therefore, an updated, critical, and extensive overview on the current and advanced analytical methods targeting markers of adulteration/authenticity, including nontarget fingerprint approaches will be provided. The most recent advances on molecular, chromatographic, and spectroscopic methodologies will be described, emphasizing their pros and cons for the identification of botanical and geographical origins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据