4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Noble metal-free modified electrode of exfoliated graphitic carbon nitride/ZnO nanosheets for highly efficient hydrogen peroxide sensing

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 247, 期 -, 页码 787-794

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.07.083

关键词

Graphitic carbon nitride; Zinc oxide; Electrocatalysis; Hydrogen peroxide sensor

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [51672220]
  2. 111 Program of MOE [B08040]
  3. National Defense Science Foundation [32102060303]
  4. Xi'an Science and Technology Foundation
  5. Shaanxi Provincial Science Foundation
  6. NPU Gaofeng Project of China [17GH020824]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4)/ZnO nanosheets were coated on the surface of fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) glass as a noble metal-free g-C3N4/ZnO/FTO electrode, which was used for the determination of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). The exfoliated g-C3N4 nanosheets were firstly prepared and then ZnO nanosheets were grown on g-C3N4 nanosheets by a microwave-assisted hydrothermal synthesis. The g-C3N4 nanosheets combined with ZnO nanosheets can greatly improve the adsorption of hydrogen peroxide and increase the conductivity of materials as well. The g-C3N4/ZnO nanosheets were characterized by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopic (SEM), transmission electron microscopic (TEM), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis. Meanwhile, electrochemical measurements of the g-C3N4/ZnO/FTO electrode were utilized to investigate the amperometric sensing of hydrogen peroxide. The prepared g-C3N4/ZnO/FTO electrode revealed the sensitivity of 540.8 mu A mM (1)cm (2) at -0.5 V with the linear response range from 0.05 to 14.15 mM, which even was superior to some noble metal-decorated H2O2 sensors. Additionally, the g-C3N4/ZnO/FTO electrode also showed the reliable operational and environmental stability for electrochemical reduction of H2O2. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据