4.7 Article

An amplified fluorescent aptasensor based on single-stranded DNA binding protein, copper and silica nanoparticles for sensitive detection of interferon-gamma

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 984, 期 -, 页码 162-167

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2017.06.032

关键词

Interferon-gamma; Single-stranded DNA-binding-protein; Copper nanoparticles; Silica nanoparticles; Fluorescent aptasensing platform

资金

  1. Mashhad University of Medical Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is great significance to identify interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), as a biological marker for diagnosis of latent tuberculosis, in serum samples. In this paper, a novel fluorescent aptasensor was fabricated and applied for sensitive and specific detection of IFN-gamma. This biosensor was based on hairpin structure of oligonucleotide, single-stranded DNA-binding protein (SSB), copper nanoparticles (CuNPs) and silica nanoparticles coated with streptavidin (SNPs-Streptavidin). The presences of double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) region and poly thymine (T) in the hairpin structure of the oligonucleotide, SSB and SNPs-streptavidin caused IFN-gamma determination with high selectivity and sensitivity. Upon addition of IFN-gamma, the hairpin structure of the oligonucleotide was disassembled and therefore, poly T strand interacted with SSB and a weak fluorescence signal was obtained. Without introduction of IFN-gamma the hairpin structure of oligonucleotide was preserved and fluorescent CuNPs were formed on the stem region of hairpin structure of oligonucleotide, resulting in strong fluorescence intensity. Under optimal conditions, concentration as low as 1 pg/mL IFN-gamma could be detected, with a linear range between 10 pg/mL and 4 ng/mL. The presented method was further performed for detection of IFN-gamma in the spiked human serum samples and the recoveries were 92.52%-98.32%, showing the great potential of the proposed analytical method in biomedical analysis. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据