4.5 Article

CircRNA_100782 regulates pancreatic carcinoma proliferation through the IL6-STAT3 pathway

期刊

ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 5783-5794

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S150678

关键词

circular RNA; pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; sponge; proliferation; microRNA; IL6-STAT3 pathway

资金

  1. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai, China [13ZR1406700, 13DZ1930908]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are a novel class of noncoding RNAs that play an important role in cancer. However, the mechanisms by which circRNAs regulate gene expression in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remain unclear. This study seeks to elucidate the role that circRNAs play in the proliferation of PDAC cells. On the basis of previous studies of circRNA expression profiles in PDAC, we found that the circRNA_100782 was markedly upregulated in PDAC tissue. Functional experiments revealed that circRNA_100782 downregulation inhibited BxPC3 cell proliferation and colony formation. Loss-of-function studies showed that knockdown of circRNA_100782 inhibited cell proliferation by downregulating the microRNA-124 (miR-124) target genes interleukin-6 receptor (IL6R) and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3). Overexpression of miR-124 also inhibited BxPC3 cell proliferation by reducing the expression of IL6R and STAT3, which was consistent with the result of silencing circRNA_100782. In addition, luciferase assay revealed that miR-124 was a direct target of circRNA_100782. Silencing STAT3 inhibited BxPC3 cell proliferation and colony formation. Cell viability was reduced in BxPC3 cells treated with si-circRNA_100782 and miR-124 mimic, and this effect could be attenuated by activating STAT3. In vivo study validated that circRNA_100782 knockdown suppressed BxPC3 xenografts in nude mice. Taken together, these results suggest that circRNA_100782 regulates BxPC3 cell proliferation by acting as miR-124 sponge through the IL6-STAT3 pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据