4.5 Review

Electron-positron pair production in ultrastrong laser fields

期刊

MATTER AND RADIATION AT EXTREMES
卷 2, 期 5, 页码 225-242

出版社

AIP PUBLISHING LLC
DOI: 10.1016/j.mre.2017.07.002

关键词

Strong field physics; Vacuum pair production; Nonlinear quantum electrodynamics

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [11475026, 11175023]
  2. Open Fund of National Laboratory of Science and Technology on Computational Physics at IAPCM
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (FRFCU)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electron-positron pair production due to the decay of vacuum in ultrastrong laser fields is an interesting topic which is revived recently because of the rapid development of current laser technology. The theoretical and numerical research progress of this challenging topic is reviewed. Many new findings are presented by different approaches such as the worldline instantons, the S-matrix theory, the kinetic method by solving the quantum Vlasov equation or/and the real-time Dirac-Heisenberg-Wigner formalism, the computational quantum field theory by solving the Dirac equation and so on. In particular, the effects of electric field polarizations on pair production are unveiled with different patterns of created momentum spectra. The effects of polarizations on the number density of created particles and the nonperturbative signatures of multiphoton process are also presented. The competitive interplay between the multiphoton process and nonperturbation process plays a key role in these new findings. These newly discovered phenomena are valuable to deepen the understanding of pair production in complex fields and even have an implication to the study of strong-field ionization. More recent studies on the pair production in complex fields as well as beyond laser fields are briefly presented in the view point of perspective future. (C) 2017 Science and Technology Information Center, China Academy of Engineering Physics. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据