4.5 Article

Biodiversity Sensitive Urban Design

期刊

CONSERVATION LETTERS
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/conl.12411

关键词

Biodiversity rating scheme; conservation planning; grasslands; landscape design; nature in cities; urban biodiversity; population viability; sustainable urban development

资金

  1. Myer Foundation
  2. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions
  3. National Environmental Science Programme (NESP) Threatened Species Recovery Hub
  4. NESP Clean Air and Urban Landscapes Hub
  5. RMIT University's Human Research Ethics Committee [CHEAN A 0000018851-07/14]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cities are increasingly considered important places for biodiversity conservation because they can harbor threatened species and because conservation in cities represents an opportunity to reconnect people with nature and the range of health and well-being benefits it provides. However, urbanization can be catastrophic for native species, and is a well-known threat to biodiversity worldwide. Urbanization impacts can be mitigated by urban design and development improvements, but take-up of these practices has been slow. There is an urgent need to incorporate existing ecological knowledge into a framework that can be used by planners and developers to ensure that biodiversity conservation is considered in decision-making processes. Here, we distill the urban biodiversity literature into five principles for biodiversity sensitive urban design (BSUD), ranging from creating habitat and promoting dispersal to facilitating community stewardship. We then present a framework for implementing BSUD aimed at delivering onsite benefits to biodiversity, and that is applicable across a range of urban development types and densities. We illustrate the application of the BSUD framework in two case studies focusing on the: (1) protection of an endangered vegetation remnant in a new low-density subdivision; and (2) persistence of an endangered reptile in an established suburban environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据