4.5 Article

Regional Bans on Wild-Bird Trade Modify Invasion Risks at a Global Scale

期刊

CONSERVATION LETTERS
卷 10, 期 6, 页码 717-725

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/conl.12361

关键词

Environmental suitability; ecological niche models; invasion risks; Psittaciformes; trade redirection; trade regulations; wild-caught birds

资金

  1. FEDER by Programa Operacional Factores de Competitividade - COMPETE
  2. National funds by FCT (Foundation for Science and Technology) [PTDC/AAG-GLO/0463/2014 - POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016583]
  3. COST Action [ES1304]
  4. CIBIO-InBIO [PTDC/AAG-GLO/0463/2014 - POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016583]
  5. project ESFRI LifeWatch
  6. FCT [SFRH/BPD/93079/2013]
  7. POPH/FSE
  8. Fundacion REPSOL
  9. H2020-MSCA-IF grant [706318]
  10. Danish National Research Foundation [DNRF96]
  11. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/93079/2013] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wildlife trade is currently the most important and increasing source of vertebrate invasive species. However, exhaustive analyses of potential side effects of trade regulations on this pathway of introduction are lacking. We addressed this by combining environmental niche models and global trade data on parrots (Psittaciformes), one of the most widely traded and worldwide invasive taxa. We used the wild bird trade bans of United States (1992) and Europe (2005) as case-studies. Results showed that regional bans can generate geographic redirections in trade, with important consequences on worldwide invasion risk. While the amount of parrots traded internationally remained largely constant, changes in trade destination occurred. Consequently, the world surface predicted at risk of parrot invasions increased with successive bans. Of concern, a redirection of trade toward developing countries was observed. Attention should be paid on the mismatch between the global requirements of invasion management and the regional scales governing trade regulations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据