4.3 Article

Radiation dose benchmarks in pediatric cardiac catheterization: A prospective multi-center C3PO-QI study

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26911

关键词

congenital heart disease; pediatrics; comparative effectiveness; patient centered outcomes research; health care outcomes; imaging; angiographic; fluoroscopic; pediatric intervention

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectivesThis study sought to update benchmark values to use a quality measure prospectively. BackgroundCongenital Cardiac Catheterization Outcomes Project - Quality Improvement (C3PO-QI), a multi-center registry, defined initial radiation dose benchmarks retrospectively across common interventional procedures. These data facilitated a dose metric endorsed by the American College of Cardiology in 2014. MethodsData was collected prospectively by 9 C3PO-QI institutions with complete case capture between 1/1/2014 and 6/30/2015. Radiation was measured in total air kerma (mGy), dose area product (DAP) (mu Gy*M-2), DAP per body weight, and fluoroscopy time (min), and reported by age group as median, 75(th) and 95(th)%ile for the following six interventional procedures: (1) atrial septal defect closure; (2) aortic valvuloplasty; (3) treatment of coarctation of the aorta; (4) patent ductus arteriosus closure; (5) pulmonary valvuloplasty; and (6) transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation. ResultsThe study was comprised of 1,680 unique cases meeting inclusion criteria. Radiation doses were lowest for pulmonary valvuloplasty (age <1 yrs, median mGy: 59, DAP: 249) and highest in transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation (age >15 yrs, median mGy: 1835, DAP: 17990). DAP/kg standardized outcome measures across weights within an age group and procedure type significantly more than DAP alone. Radiation doses decreased for all procedures compared to those reported previously by both median and median weight-based percentile curves. These differences in radiation exposure were observed without changes in median fluoroscopy time. ConclusionsThis study updates previously established benchmarks to reflect QI efforts over time. These thresholds can be applied for quality measurement and comparison. (c) 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据