4.4 Review

Prostate cancer and supportive care: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis of men's experiences and unmet needs

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE
卷 24, 期 5, 页码 618-634

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12286

关键词

prostate cancer; supportive care; systematic review; peer support; specialist nurse; qualitative synthesis

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [PB-PG-1111-26018] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)
  2. Department of Health [PB-PG-1111-26018] Funding Source: Medline
  3. National Institute for Health Research [PB-PG-1111-26018] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men worldwide, accounting for an estimated 1.1 million new cases diagnosed in 2012 (). Currently, there is a lack of specific guidance on supportive care for men with prostate cancer. This article describes a qualitative systematic review and synthesis examining men's experience of and need for supportive care. Seven databases were searched; 20 journal articles were identified and critically appraised. A thematic synthesis was conducted in which descriptive themes were drawn out of the data. These were peer support, support from partner, online support, cancer specialist nurse support, self-care, communication with health professionals, unmet needs (emotional support, information needs, support for treatment-induced side effects of incontinence and erectile dysfunction) and men's suggestions for improved delivery of supportive care. This was followed by the development of overarching analytic themes which were: uncertainty, reframing, and the timing of receiving treatment, information and support. Our results show that the most valued form of support men experienced following diagnosis was one-to-one peer support and support from partners. This review highlights the need for improved access to cancer specialist nurses throughout the care pathway, individually tailored supportive care and psychosexual support for treatment side effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据