4.7 Article

Sortase-Mediated Ligation as a Modular Approach for the Covalent Attachment of Proteins to the Exterior of the Bacteriophage P22 Virus-like Particle

期刊

BIOCONJUGATE CHEMISTRY
卷 28, 期 8, 页码 2114-2124

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.7b00296

关键词

-

资金

  1. Welch Foundation [BP-0037]
  2. Department of Defense (DoD) Air Force Office of Sponsored Research through the National Defense Science & Engineering Graduate (NDSEG)
  3. National Institutes of Health [R01 AI104905 547]
  4. National Science Foundation [NSF-BMAT DMR-1507282]
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  6. Division Of Materials Research [1507282] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Virus-like particles are unique platforms well suited for the construction of nanomaterials with broad-range applications. The research presented here describes the development of a modular approach for the covalent attachment of protein domains to the exterior of the versatile bacteriophage P22 virus-like particle (VLP) via a sortase-mediated ligation strategy. The bacteriophage P22 coat protein was genetically engineered to incorporate an LPETG amino acid sequence on the C-terminus, providing the peptide recognition sequence utilized by the sortase enzyme to catalyze peptide bond formation between the LPETG-tagged protein and a protein containing a polyglycine sequence on the N-terminus. Here we evaluate attachment of green fluorescent protein (GFP) and the head domain of the influenza hemagglutinin (HA) protein by genetically producing polyglycine tagged proteins. Attachment of both proteins to the exterior of the P22 VLP was found to be highly efficient as judged by SDS-PAGE densitometry. These results enlarge the tool kit for modifying the P22 VLP system and provide new insights for other VLPs that have an externally displayed C-terminus that can use the described strategy for the modular modification of their external surface for various applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据