4.8 Article

Hydrogen-rich gas production by steam reforming of n-dodecane. Part II: Stability, regenerability and sulfur poisoning of low loading Rh-based catalyst

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 218, 期 -, 页码 317-326

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.06.059

关键词

Hydrogen; n-Dodecane; Steam reforming; Rh catalyst; Carbon deposition; Sulfur poisoning

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research, MIUR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, 0.6 wt.% Rh/CeO2 catalyst was synthesized by the Solution Combustion Synthesis (SCS) method, producing a low-cost noble metal-based system due to the simultaneous high dispersion and low metal phase content. The catalyst was characterized by the XRD, N-2-physisorption, C0-chemisorption, TPR, TPO and TEM measurements. Deactivation by carbon deposition was investigated in Steam Reforming (SR) of n-dodecane, used as surrogate for diesel fuel, in order to explore the appropriate coke-free reaction conditions. The catalyst regenerability was also investigated. Then, the effect of sulfur poisoning was studied in SR of n-dodecane doped with thiophene, used as model compound for the organic sulfur in diesel fuel. Stability tests were performed at various steam-to-carbon ratio (S/C = 1-2.5), space velocity (GHSV= 16,000-40,000 h(-1)) and sulfur content (0-100 ppm S). In order to avoid carbon/coke deposition due to cracking of n-dodecane, tests were carried out using the temperature-controlled bed configuration (500-800 degrees C) previously studied. Stable catalytic performance was achieved under sulfur-free condition. Constant H-2 concentration (62%, N-2-free basis) in the product mixture and absence of carbon deposition were observed at S/C = 1.5 for 100 h of time-on-stream. Catalyst deactivation was observed in the presence of sulfur, mainly due to graphitic carbon deposition. Higher amount of steam allowed improving the carbon gasification and the sulfur tolerance, enhancing the catalytic stability of the Rh/CeO2 system. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据