4.5 Article

An Intracardiac Soft Robotic Device for Augmentation of Blood Ejection from the Failing Right Ventricle

期刊

ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
卷 45, 期 9, 页码 2222-2233

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-017-1855-z

关键词

Right heart failure; Soft robotics; Mechanical circulatory support

资金

  1. NIH/NHLBI NCAI Boston Biomedical Innovation Center Pilot Grant
  2. DoD CDMRP Discovery Award [W81XWH-15-1-0248]
  3. Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering
  4. Harvard Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We introduce an implantable intracardiac soft robotic right ventricular ejection device (RVED) for dynamic approximation of the right ventricular (RV) free wall and the interventricular septum (IVS) in synchrony with the cardiac cycle to augment blood ejection in right heart failure (RHF). The RVED is designed for safe and effective intracardiac operation and consists of an anchoring system deployed across the IVS, an RV free wall anchor, and a pneumatic artificial muscle linear actuator that spans the RV chamber between the two anchors. Using a ventricular simulator and a custom controller, we characterized ventricular volume ejection, linear approximation against different loads and the effect of varying device actuation periods on volume ejection. The RVED was then tested in vivo in adult pigs (n = 5). First, we successfully deployed the device into the beating heart under 3D echocardiography guidance (n = 4). Next, we performed a feasibility study to evaluate the device's ability to augment RV ejection in an experimental model of RHF (n = 1). RVED actuation augmented RV ejection during RHF; while further chronic animal studies will provide details about the efficacy of this support device. These results demonstrate successful design and implementation of the RVED and its deployment into the beating heart. This soft robotic ejection device has potential to serve as a rapidly deployable system for mechanical circulatory assistance in RHF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据