4.7 Article

Bone mineral density and fractures after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women at increased risk for breast and ovarian cancer

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 51, 期 3, 页码 400-408

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.11.022

关键词

Genes; BRCA1, BRCA2; Ovariectomy; Osteoporosis; Fractures; Bone

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) reduces ovarian cancer risk in BRCA mutation carriers. RRSO is assumed to decrease bone mineral density (BMD) and increase fracture risk more than natural menopause. We aimed to compare BMD and fracture incidence after premenopausal RRSO to general population data and identify risk factors for low BMD and fractures after RRSO. Methods: In 212 women with RRSO at premenopausal age, BMD was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Fractures and risk factors were assessed by self-administered questionnaire Fracture incidence after RRSO was compared to general practitioner data by using standardised incidence ratios (SIRs). Risk factors for low standardised BMD-scores and fractures were identified by regression analyses. Results: Median age at RRSO was 42 years (range 35-65) and duration of follow-up 5 years (2-8). Standardised lumbar spine (Z = 0.01, p = 0.870) and femoral neck BMD (Z = 0.15, p = 0.019) were not lower than population BMD. Higher age at time of RRSO and use of hormonal replacement therapy were associated with higher, and current smoking with lower standardised BMD-scores. Sixteen women reported 22 fractures. Fracture incidence was not higher than expected from the general population (all fractures: 25-44 years: SIR 2.12 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85-4.37]; 45-64 years: SIR 1.65 [95% CI 0.92-2.72]). Conclusion: Five years after RRSO, BMD and fracture incidence were not different than expected from the general population. Based on these data it appears safe not to intensively screen for osteoporosis within five years after RRSO, although prospective research on the long-term effects of RRSO on bone is warranted. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据