4.8 Article

Ultralong Phosphorescence of Water-Soluble Organic Nanoparticles for In Vivo Afterglow Imaging

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 29, 期 33, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201606665

关键词

afterglow; lymph node imaging; molecular imaging; organic semiconducting nanoparticles; phosphorescence

资金

  1. Nanyang Technological University start-up grant [NTU-SUG: M4081627.120]
  2. Academic Research Fund Tier 2 from Singapore Ministry of Education [MOE2014-T2-1-003]
  3. Academic Research Fund Tier 1 from Singapore Ministry of Education [M4011559.120, RG133/15]
  4. NTU-Northwestern Institute for Nanomedicine [M4081502.F40]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21674049, 21304049, 61136003, 2015CB932200]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Afterglow or persistent luminescence eliminates the need for light excitation and thus circumvents the issue of autofluorescence, holding promise for molecular imaging. However, current persistent luminescence agents are rare and limited to inorganic nanoparticles. This study reports the design principle, synthesis, and proof-of-concept application of organic semiconducting nanoparticles (OSNs) with ultralong phosphorescence for in vivo afterglow imaging. The design principle leverages the formation of aggregates through a top-down nanoparticle formulation to greatly stabilize the triplet excited states of a phosphorescent molecule. This prolongs the particle luminesce to the timescale that can be detected by the commercial whole-animal imaging system after removal of external light source. Such ultralong phosphorescent of OSNs is inert to oxygen and can be repeatedly activated, permitting imaging of lymph nodes in living mice with a high signal-to-noise ratio. This study not only introduces the first category of water-soluble ultralong phosphorescence organic nanoparticles but also reveals a universal design principle to prolong the lifetime of phosphorescent molecules to the level that can be effective for molecular imaging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据